Defenses against homicide charges require robust legal expertise. At Perlman & Cohen, we recognize that facing such serious charges as a criminal offense can be daunting. An effective defense strategy is crucial. It can significantly alter the outcome of your case. This may lead to reduced charges or even dismissal. Our experienced attorneys have successfully defended many individuals against murder charges in Los Angeles.
We assert that everyone is entitled to a strong legal defense. Our defense focuses on key elements of the prosecution's case, like the defendant's actions and any compelling evidence. We check if the defendant believed they were in imminent danger or faced a perceived threat that justified their actions. This includes cases involving deadly force or a deadly weapon. Here, the defense claims the defendant acted to prevent serious bodily harm or great bodily harm.
Homicide charges in California cover many kinds of unlawful killing. These range from first-degree murder to involuntary manslaughter. For each type, the prosecutor must prove certain things beyond any doubt, such as criminal intent and the specific threat faced by the victim.
The exact charge you face will affect your defense options. First-degree murder has the toughest penalties and requires proving the defendant committed the crime with premeditation. Manslaughter charges, while still serious, usually mean less jail time. A robust defense may include asserting that the defendant claims they acted under extreme emotional distress or in response to imminent harm. Surveillance footage or other convincing evidence might show the defendant's actions were reasonable.
You need a skilled attorney who knows the key parts of your charge to build a good defense strategy. This includes questioning if the prosecution has the right person, challenging witness testimony, and using expert analysis to argue the defendant's guilt isn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In cases involving domestic violence or claims of using lethal force, the defense asserts that a reasonable person might have acted similarly under the circumstances.
California divides murder into first-degree and second-degree. First-degree murder means you planned to kill someone before doing it. Second-degree murder is killing someone on purpose but without planning.
There are two types of manslaughter: voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary manslaughter happens during a sudden fight or when you're very upset. Involuntary manslaughter occurs when someone dies because of your careless actions. Not all homicides are treated equally - these differences matter for your defense and potential sentence.
There are several ways to defend against homicide charges. The best approach depends on the facts, witnesses, and details of what happened. We look at every part of your case to find the strongest defense.
When building your defense, we consider all possible options. From self-defense claims to questioning witness testimony, each defense must be carefully planned. Here are some common defense strategies we use in homicide cases.
Self-defense is one of the best defenses in homicide cases. In California, you can protect yourself when you think someone might kill you or hurt you badly. For self-defense to work as justifiable homicide, you must have believed you needed to act right away. Also, you must have used only enough force to stop the threat.
California law doesn't make you run away before using force to defend yourself. If you reasonably believed you were in danger, self-defense may clear you of all charges. Your defense depends on showing that any normal person would have done the same thing when facing such a threat.
Like self-defense, defense of others lets you use force to protect someone else from harm. This defense works when you reasonably believe another person is in danger and you act to protect them.
The main points are your belief that the person faced immediate danger and that your actions were needed to protect them. This defense works well when there's good evidence backing up your view of the threat. If you believe your actions would prevent harm to another person, this defense might apply to your case.
An alibi defense works by showing you were somewhere else when the crime happened. This directly challenges the claim that you committed the homicide by proving you couldn't have been there.
Evidence for an alibi defense includes:
Getting this evidence quickly is important. Videos get deleted, and people forget details over time. Mistaken identity is a real problem in homicide cases, and an alibi defense directly addresses this issue.
For first-degree murder charges, prosecutors must prove you planned the killing ahead of time. A lack of intent defense challenges this by showing you didn't plan to kill anyone.
Evidence that supports this defense includes strong emotions, being provoked, or actions showing the incident wasn't planned. By fighting the planning element, we try to reduce charges from first-degree to second-degree murder or manslaughter. This means less jail time if you're convicted.
In all criminal cases, prosecutors must prove every part of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This high standard lets us challenge their case by finding weaknesses in their evidence. Creating reasonable doubt about your guilt is enough to win your case.
Common evidence problems include dirty crime scenes, unreliable witnesses, broken evidence handling, and incomplete police work. We carefully check all evidence to find these weaknesses. Our goal is to show that the prosecution's case isn't strong enough to prove your guilt.
Mental state defenses focus on your mind when the incident happened. These defenses don't deny what happened. Instead, they argue your mental condition should reduce or eliminate your criminal responsibility.
These defenses often need expert testimony from doctors. The experts explain how your mental state affects your ability to think clearly. Though not simple, these defenses may be your best option in certain cases.
Diminished capacity argues that mental illness or brain problems keep you from thinking clearly. While California limits this defense, it can still help reduce charges by showing you couldn't plan or understand your actions.
This defense rarely leads to complete freedom. However, it may work as a partial defense, resulting in lighter charges and shorter jail time. For example, a mental illness that affects your thinking might prevent a first-degree murder conviction.
There are two types of intoxication defenses: voluntary (choosing to drink or use drugs) and involuntary (being drugged without knowing). Voluntary intoxication isn't a complete defense. But it may show you couldn't form the specific intent needed for first-degree murder.
Involuntary intoxication can be a stronger defense. It affects your basic understanding of your actions. This defense requires proving someone drugged you without your knowledge. It also must show this prevented you from understanding what you were doing.
California's insanity defense has strict rules. It requires proof that when the act occurred, you either didn't understand what you were doing or didn't know it was wrong. Meeting this standard needs strong expert testimony and solid evidence.
A successful insanity defense typically puts you in a mental health facility until doctors say you're safe. It's not immediate freedom. This defense is rarely used because it's complex and may lead to long-term commitment. But in cases of severe mental illness, it may be appropriate to focus on treatment rather than punishment.
A strong defense often directly challenges the prosecution's evidence and procedures. We look for legal violations, evidence problems, and procedural errors that weaken their case. Our defense attorneys examine everything from your first contact with police through evidence collection.
By challenging the prosecution's case, we may get key evidence thrown out. This approach needs knowledge of criminal procedure and evidence rules. That's why experienced legal representation is so important for your defense.
The Constitution protects you against illegal searches and forced confessions. Evidence obtained by breaking these rules can be suppressed. This means it cannot be used against you at trial.
If police searched your home without a proper warrant, any evidence found may be thrown out. Also, if they didn't read your rights before questioning or pressured you into confessing, those statements might be excluded. These challenges can seriously damage the prosecution's case against you.
Eyewitness testimony often convinces juries but can be wrong. Factors affecting witness reliability include:
We work to show these reliability issues through questioning witnesses. We also bring in experts who know about memory and perception. By highlighting these problems, we create reasonable doubt about witness testimony.
Forensic evidence like DNA, ballistics, and blood patterns may seem perfect to juries. However, each type has limits and potential errors. Collection methods, testing procedures, and interpretation can all have problems.
We work with independent forensic experts to review the prosecution's evidence. They help find issues with how it was collected, tested, or explained. Sometimes, what looks like strong forensic evidence actually has other explanations or serious flaws.
First-degree murder charges require proof that you planned and meant to kill someone. These charges carry the most severe penalties, including life in prison. Defending against these charges means attacking each part they must prove.
We often challenge the planning element. We show circumstances that would have made planning impossible. We may also challenge their timeline, question witness credibility, or present other explanations for the evidence. Successfully challenging just one required element can result in acquittal or reduced charges.
Second-degree murder involves intentional killing without planning. Prosecutors must still prove you acted with conscious disregard for human life. These charges are serious but typically carry lighter sentences than first-degree murder.
Defense strategies often focus on challenging the malice element. We might show you acted in the heat of passion, were provoked, or honestly believed you needed to defend yourself. These approaches aim to reduce charges of voluntary manslaughter. We also look for evidence supporting complete defenses like self-defense.
Manslaughter charges carry lighter sentences than murder charges. Voluntary manslaughter involves killing during a sudden fight or when very upset. Involuntary manslaughter involves unintentional deaths from careless actions.
For voluntary manslaughter, we often argue you were provoked and acted before cooling off. For involuntary manslaughter, we challenge claims of criminal negligence. We show your actions were reasonable or the death was a true accident. The defense strategy differs greatly between these two types of charges.
California law includes special circumstances that can increase penalties for homicide. These might result in life without parole or death sentences. Special circumstances include killings during certain felonies, multiple murders, or murders of specific victims like police officers.
These special circumstances make homicide cases more complex. They require specialized defense approaches. Let's look at two common special circumstance situations and possible defense strategies.
California's felony murder rule means you can be charged with murder for deaths during certain dangerous felonies. This applies even if you didn't personally kill anyone. Recent reforms have limited this rule. Now, it requires actual participation in the killing or acting with reckless disregard for human life.
Defense strategies include challenging your participation in the underlying felony. We might dispute that you were a major participant. Or we might show you didn't act with reckless disregard for human life. If the death occurred in a way unrelated to your actions, this may also provide a defense.
Gang enhancements can add years to homicide sentences. Prosecutors claim the crime benefited or was directed by a gang. These enhancements require proving gang membership and that the crime specifically benefited the gang.
Effective defenses include challenging evidence of gang membership. We question whether the crime actually benefited a gang. Or we argue the connection between the alleged gang and the crime is weak. Constitutional challenges to gang evidence may also work in certain cases.
Expert witnesses play a crucial role in homicide defenses. These professionals help jurors understand complex evidence. They provide special knowledge about mental states, forensic analysis, or medical findings.
At Perlman & Cohen, we work with respected expert witnesses. They can analyze evidence, challenge prosecution experts, and explain complex concepts clearly to juries. Expert testimony can often make the difference between conviction and acquittal in homicide cases.
If you face homicide charges, you need to act now. Early help from an experienced defense team can make a big difference in your case. At Perlman & Cohen, we offer free, private consultations to discuss your situation and potential defense strategies.
We understand this is probably the hardest time in your life. Our team is available to answer your questions and start building your defense. Everyone deserves quality legal representation when facing such serious charges. Contact us today to learn how we can fight for your rights and build a strong defense for your case.
"*" indicates required fields
If you or a loved one needs the assistance of our criminal law attorneys, please feel free to contact us in the way that is most convenient to you, whether that is calling us at (310) 557-1700 or completing the contact form below. All fields are required.
